Portfolio

The example databases below represent a sample of my work across different research contexts. Each was designed in close collaboration with a research team (whether my own or others) to fit specific recording protocols, field conditions, and objectives. The database I design for you could look very different to meet your project goals, or it could build on a similar structure. All databases can be used on iPads (including offline environments) and any PC or Mac computer.

Field Case 1: Archaeological Excavation

A comprehensive field database for archaeological excavation. The database links excavation units to individual context records in a structured relational system, with integrated tabs for soil description, stratigraphic matrix, artifact inventories, carbon samples, human remains, photo registries, and daily logs. Standardized pop-up menus and visual analysis guides reduce data entry error across teams of varying experience levels. A built-in completion checklist ensures all required tasks are documented.

Field Case 2: Field Survey

A field database for systematic survey in any discipline, from archaeology to geology, historic preservation, and ecological monitoring. The archaeological example here records surface site and feature locations, surface artifact distributions, architectural observations, and environmental conditions recorded during pedestrian survey. The database includes fields for photographs and sketch maps linked directly to each record. Standardized value lists ensure consistent terminology across survey crews working simultaneously in different areas.
Survey: Structure RegistrySurvey: Masonry Attributes

Lab Case 1: Material Analysis

A laboratory database for systematic material attribute analysis. This example is a ceramic analysis database that can be used alone or alongside an excavation field database. Attribute fields cover vessel form, fragment type, decoration, surface treatment, temper, color, and manufacturing method, supported throughout by visual reference guides embedded directly in the form. Each record integrates in-situ (field) photographs, laboratory photographs, and scaled drawings for side-by-side comparison, making it easy to monitor consistency across analysts and student collaborators. A similar database could be designed for the analysis of any other material type.
Survey: Structure RegistrySurvey: Masonry Attributes

Lab Case 2: Comparative Studies

A researcher's tool to systematically collect, consolidate, and compare published or museographical data. Use cases include comparing published data across an archaeological category — such as burials, ceramics, or species — found in the literature or across a region. The example shown here collected data on Spondylous shells from archaeological contexts to discern patterns of ancient use by region, period, culture, and context.
Survey: Structure RegistrySurvey: Masonry Attributes

Contact Me

Contact me at fieldbuiltdata@gmail.com to start creating a tailored database that fits your research needs.